NIKON RELEASES FREE NEW NX STUDIO SOFTWARE TO VIEW, PROCESS AND EDIT STILL IMAGES AND VIDEO - DES GUIDES + 1 FORMATION PHOTO

Looking for:

Nikon Japan abandons ViewNX 2, ViewNX-i, Capture NX2 and Capture NX-D completely - DIY Photography. 

Click here to DOWNLOAD

     

- Nikon capture nx2 youtube free

 

Totally, affinity photo on ipad does it, check it out - not a subscription. It's 20 quid one off payment. People have been copying files from one computer to another without sending them to a middle man for many decades now.

If their cloud storage is the only way to move photos, then the app is broken. It was probably designed that way to justify a monthly fee.

Rather a different concept - but of course you're not obliged to want it or like it. YesYesYes - give it a rest with the same comment everywhere.

Affinity is great, and a bargain, but has very sub-par Raw development, and has no concept of synchronisation. Note, IMHO what C1 is managing to illustrate so far is just how good and flexible Adobe's approach to cross-device synchronisation is.

And I speak as primarily a C1 user. The problem of having baked-in edits has nothing to do with file synchronization across multiple devices. As for such synchronization, there's no reason for that to require sending your file to a third party either. There are already a couple of videos online, demonstrating the UI and features. Have you ever tried to get bugs fixed or even acknowledged, you'll have to go through 'support' first which is basically impossible.

I reported a bug on v I got a very courteous reply in under a day from a developer confirming the issue and asking me if I could generate a bit more evidence. I was told that a fix had been identified and would be in a subsequent dot release as soon as it was tested. The fix indeed turned up in the next update, and the same developer followed up with me to check that it was working for me.

I've contacted them a dozen times and it's like talking to a wall. I've been a user since Capture 4. Usually they claim no one else has this problem or say they will add it to the list of bug fixes and never do. Also asked them to give us the option to not have to click on "Pick All" when ingesting and they said they won't fix since people want it that way.

What a bunch of arrogant -hoals. Their support used to be good before the war started in Ukraine. I read somewhere their support and help desk was done from that country so that could explain the lack of support now. Jethro B-UK It might be similar, but way overpriced.

Plus a little bit of cloud storage. I switched from Adobe to C1 because I liked the output better off my Fuji files, but I have to say that the Adobe suite offers the better deal by far off you look at value for money.

The premium you pay for C1 is substantial, but i can understand that a more niche player often is not the cheapest option. In the last year though I see a transition towards a direction I don't like. I am Testing the beta and not really liking it compared to Lightroom or Pixelmator.

A new CEO will do that What evidence do you have? In both cases raw adjustments on iPad correspond to raw adjustments on desktop. Apple raw engine, this would not be possible. This App lacks basic features, like curves and advanced color adjustments!

What the hell! This means styles that use those features will not work and look vastly different when applied. How is that usefull? It's basically a rating and culling app for later editing on the desktop. But even there it lacks proper workflow Integration with self hosted sessions or tethering. The engine to apply the styles is already integrated in the app though. Also I usually apply a style on a layer so I can adjust how strong the style is applied.

Not possible in the iOS app so far. I use format. They want to be the most expensive photographer software ever? They are really not comparable in overall purpose. It's free in the same sense that firmware updates for cameras are free; that is, if you forget that it's baked into the price you pay for the product. Totally, Photoshop is good, but over priced. Adobe Photoshop touch was ok for basic stuff and it worked on android android 8 and ipad.

Why overpay for it if u can do it in affinity on ipad for 20 quid, they also do 50 percent discounts, and i got it for 10 quid. U can use demo for 3 months. Check it out. C1 pricing and product offerings. Adobe products offer far more for the money IMO, but it also seems like C1 has gotten awful greedy these days.

Since captureONe offers a subscription now which it seems a reasonable number of people use it over buying the perpetual license it no longer really matters which program you use. You still have the same advantages latest version all the time for a monthly fee , so at that point, people should just pick one and go with it. Photo editing software debates are getting to be about as boring and old as camera brand debates. They all have their pros and cons, and one may be better than the other for your specific needs.

It gives companies like Adobe some competition and moves everything forward. Same for camera companies. Competition is good. Technically you never really 'owned' your old software either. You owned a license to use that software, but in almost all cases there are situations where the company can revoke that license for various reasons.

Every piece of software I purchased is mine. I own it and use at will. Nearly all of them receive updates for free also. Just right, Gannon. But many people aren't looking over the plate. And don't understand, anyway. Therefore the reaction, as above your comment. SteveAnderson you can fool yourself into thinking own your software but if you read the licence agreement it will confirm you do NOT.

SteveAnderson when was the last time you sold a used software license on a legal used software license market? If you own it it would be your right to sell it.

Gannon -- I really do not think you are right. It would be very difficult if not impossible for a company to in practice revoke a person's ability to use one-time paid software, mainly because the vast majority of those installations did not have any technical mechanism to do so.

So from the end-user's perspective, they essentially own it, even if it is governed by end-user license agreements. And if you actually read EULAs, they basically say you just shouldn't use the software for some nefarious purposes, etc. In reality, I can watch the movie I bought forever. It is not rented nor living in a cloud. Same for every other movie, game, application that has ever been purchased.

Not even a network connection necessary. It is simply not sustainable to continue to develop an application for a stagnating user base this way. There is simply not enough growth in the advanced photography population to draw in enough new customers.

As far as I know most of that population prefer to stick with their choice of tools, so it is unlikely to channel new customers from other tools in general, of course if Adobe screws up something, the rest of the industry gains from it. Each release circle it takes more and more effort to produce something significant for the existing customers to collect the upgrade money, and after each iteration it becomes harder to find such significant feature which would cater for the broad audience, so that path is out of the window.

Now it should be much higher to keep a lean production running, which is simply not possible as nobody would buy perpetual license for such high price. Screw it then. I am sure many capture one workflow people will be happy but I a, not paying subscription and on top another one for an incomplete non stand alone product.

Same as Photoshop. Priced too low for professionals who will get the most utility from it and too high for the casual user. They should have either gone for the professional and price higher, or mass-market and lower, or tier the feature set so they can do both.

From the little we know so far, the features included look quite basic with more features to come. I'm willing to bet as features like masks and layers and tethering arrive, the subscription cost will increase. No word on whether curves will be added which is a real shame. It would be pretty poor to subscribe to an app and made to wait endlessly for more advanced features to be added.

From what we can read on the features from the C1 website, it sounds like this app will be quite basic, containing the sort of features you'd expect any photo editing app to contain as bare minimum. No idea how advanced the 'black and white conversion' will be, also no mention of curves which I find essential.

One thing I don't like is this C1 iPad is being released with a number of features to be added later like masks and layers. I only hope C1 can keep people informed when these features are likely to arrive and not keep users in the dark as so many other apps do.

What disappointing news then. I bought a top spec ipad to do Photoshop on the move. I was stunned at how poor it was, lacking so many key features and those it did have were so different to PS on a mac. It would require relearning how to use Photoshop. I bet C1 will be the same. Sold the ipad and won't be going back.

Get a laptop instead. I call my tablet a 'hand tv'. Because that's all it's good for. Media consumption pdf, movie, audio on the road. I would never try to do any 'work' on one of these things. The interface makes me feel like I'm drunk with mittens on. No thank you. Should have bought affinity photo for 20 quid on ipad which is very good , Photoshop on ipad looks like a toy compared with affinity.

I'm still using C1 Pro ver 11 from many years ago and it works great. I will never pay a monthly subscription for any software. I'm also running Windows 10, and I don't pay a subscription for that either, and it work great and gets free updates. There a lot of alternatives out there now. I think going forward, we have to get used to subscription based software if you want the good stuff!

There are still some that don't require subscription, but nothing I want to use. One can purchase a stand-alone one-off license and of course, stop using it at will. PAntunes, I agree. The OP's language seems at odds, best ask the OP what they actually meant. Raist3d - " I've used the Nik tools since they were actually owned by Nik so I've had UPoint for a long long time.

The Google version was free and still available so its not like some secret recipe that is exclusive to DXO. They also have been selling standalone. And it's a very acclaimed noise reduction. MDNL35, if it allows you to "be able to pick up where you left off on your creative process across devices", it needs some cloud storage.

And it would require some kind of "network" storage.. But not "cloud" storage. As it is, I cull on an ipad, and transfer selected images to my NAS for subsequent work. No cloud storage or subscription required.. Of course it wasn't free. Hard to imagine any professional that does any serious volume not having redundant local storage, though.

But the ideia is that it doesn't have to be local storage. It's something you'll use on location. Transfer pictures to the iPad or tether to it when that capability Is ready…. Edit locally on the iPad. No internet required. Edit all you want. Then when you get home you transfer images with sidecars that contain your edits to your local network storage.. The idea here is that you don't have to do the transfer manually and that you don't have to go back to your studio to copy to your private NAS.

And that's why you have to pay for a cloud service. Indeed, they talk about this in their video and on their blog. My guess is that they're still figuring out exactly what or how much to include, and where the cut off will be from where they start charging extra.

Will it be just enough to synchronize settings? Will it store some kind of proxy images? Will it be enough to transfer over about one whole session of full-size images?

Maybe not even count in GB's, but in number of images or sessions. Maybe it'll even work on some kind of fair-use basis. They did not say how much. At the moment it works only with full size images and only 1 way…. I have a Gucci ipad that I got for Christmas. I never use it. If it had a hole in the side that I could stick an sd card into it might be different.

I can't be bothered with the whole faffing around process swapping cards in and out of machines, and uploading and downloading. It's easier to just use a laptop or pc, and leave the ipad out of the equation entirely. Here it goes down the subscription model sewage pipe: CO's once biggest advantage over Adobe CO has had a subscription model for years now.

However on the desktop you have a choice. With this new product and CO's bend towards an only Apple product line they are ignoring Windows and have closed several Windows bug issues without comment or "fixes" expect to get with the plan. If you can afford a Apple product, expect to pay Apple tax rates. And since cloud storage becomes essential a subscription model is the only manageable option from a cost standpoint.

The Sigma 20mm F1. Does it take pretty pictures though? We have the answers. Sigma's been on a roll with their mirrorless Art series lenses. Does the new 24mm F1. It brings a new, 25MP sensor and bit 4K capture at up to p. We've put it to the test, both in the studio and out in the field.

In our tests it delivers big performance and offers a few good reasons why you might choose a 12th-Gen Intel laptop over a Mac. Canon's high end APS-C mirrorless camera has plenty of compelling features, but is it worth the price? Jordan took it on vacation to find out. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality.

What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best. If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites. Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform.

In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media. The latest version of Sigma's 20mm F1. Check out our gallery, including some astro images, to see how it performs! Two of the GPUs are designed for workstation desktops, while a third is for laptops.

This second-generation adapter is smaller, faster and quieter than its predecessor. Midwest Photo was robbed late last week after a stolen truck broke through the store's front entrance. The store is in the progress of recovering from the damage and stolen goods.

Photographers should be on the lookout for any suspicious product listings online. Travel with Peter to see how he shoots, and view some of the spectacular photos he captures along the way. Includes sample gallery. We go hands-on with Sigma's latest 'Digital Native' wide-angle lenses for L-mount and Sony E-mount cameras to see what features they have and what sets them apart from the rather limited competition.

Sony has announced in-camera forgery-proof photo technology for its a7 IV mirrorless camera. The technology, aimed at corporate users, cryptographically signs images in-camera to detect future pixel modification and tampering. It uses tracks, cords and hooks to store your gear flat against the wall without hiding it from view. The new Sigma 24mm F1. Check out our sample gallery to see how sharp it is, as well as how it handles flare, chromatic aberrations and sunstars.

Sigma's new 20mm F1. Chris and Jordan run through their absolute favorite lenses for Sony E-Mount, including both Sony lenses and third party options. Nikon has released the financial results for the first quarter of its fiscal year, revealing increased year-over-year revenue and profits.

Alfie Cameras is launching its Alfie TYCH next month on Kickstarter, but before then it needs beta testers to see how its triple lens half-frame camera performs. NASA is preparing for a simulated Mars mission that will house four crew members in a module on Earth. The crew will remotely control drones and rovers to collect rock samples on a simulated Mars. Skypersonic, a remote control drone company, is supplying mission-critical technology as part of the mission.

The explosion created one of the most energetic short-duration gamma-ray bursts ever observed. The Tamron Lens Utility Mobile app is set to launch later this year. The app will let you use your compatible Android device to control, customize and update compatible Tamron lenses without the need for a computer. The images, which appear to be screenshots from a press briefing, reveal some of the details of the forthcoming lens.

The Peter McKinnon camera tool features a patent-pending design that features integrated Phillips and flathead drivers, as well as extendable arms capable of holding four other bits that can be swapped out to fit your needs. Nikon has updated the firmware for its Nikkor Z 50mm F1.

Is this good or bad for the industry, and what are the long-term implications? Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register.

Best cameras and lenses. Tags: capture-one , ipad , ipados , software. View Comments Comments All Max Shutter As a recreational camera enthusiast that only posts on the Internet, I've been waiting for this and have my new iPad mini 6 ready to go.

Il existe de nombreux logiciels photo. Quel logiciel photo choisir Tri des photos dans Lightroom Classic. Darktable est une alternative libre aux logiciels ci-dessus, il propose des fonctions de gestion et de traitement des fichiers RAW. Gimp est capable de traiter de nombreux formats de fichiers sauf le RAW, il faut passer par des modules tiers.

Les partager sur un site personnel ou un site de partage aussi. Vous pouvez vous procurer Photoshop Elements sur Amazon. Pareil pour les galeries web. Il est impossible de mentionner ici tous les logiciels photos disponibles tant ils sont nombreux. Laissez un commentaire et parlons-en!

Votre commentaire. Site internet. Vous pouvez aussi vous abonner sans commenter. Bonjour, Merci pour votre article. Vincent Steinert. Pouvez-vous me donner une information concernant le format dng?

Il existe des dizaines de logiciels de traitement photo. Bonjour Jean-Christophe. Le connaissez-vous? Il y a trop de logiciels pour que je les connaisse tous. Merci Bien cordialement. Ou pixelmator que je peux lancer depuis photos.

Merci pour le retour. Est-ce possible? Rien ne vous y oblige contrairement au programme payable par abonnement! Tous les autres versions suivantes sont par abonnement mensuel. Pour AI je ne me prononce pas tant que je ne peux pas le tester. Merci pour toutes ces infos mais je ne sais toujours pas que choisir … Toutes mes photos sont en jpg et il me faut un logiciel qui ne traite pas que le raw.

Les essais gratuits me semblent corrects. Je suis sur PC et sous Windows Merci , Super article bravo! Une liste formidable. Le Mac peut afficher les photos nativement sans autre logiciel, il suffit de les voir depuis le FInder. Bien utile pour une video-projection.